TL;DR
Interpretation matters more than the number itself, but SignalX does not currently publish a live Market Score field.
Clear explanation
This page is conceptual. It describes how a future score-based policy map could work if such a field were added to the backend contract later.
A common mistake is reading any composite score as a direct buy or sell command. Professional use is policy-driven.
Until a live score exists, use the published market-state contract and verified SNAP payload instead.
Technical example: hypothetical policy map
A desk designs three hypothetical score bands with fixed risk budgets and avoids forcing trades in low-score periods.
- 01Define per-band limits before the session.
- 02Map a hypothetical score to an active policy band.
- 03Trigger alerts on conceptual band transitions.
- 04Review whether a future score would improve governance before exposing it publicly.
ASCII model
Score feed -> Policy bands -> Position sizing -> Trade frequency -> Review
0-49 defensive low sparse protect capital
50-69 caution medium selective preserve expectancy
70-100 favorable normal active harvest edgeWeak vs strong interpretation
| Practice | Weak | Professional |
|---|---|---|
| Decision style | Ad hoc | Policy-driven |
| Sizing | Inconsistent | Band-based |
| Review | PnL only | PnL + process |
Related pages
- Market Status reference →Pair current execution decisions with the live market-state contract.
- Verify published context →Confirm historical SNAP context integrity before review.
- What is Market Score →Review the concept note for a future score, not a current SignalX field.
- Risk management in crypto →Convert live market-state interpretation into hard limits.
FAQ
Should rules differ by asset?
Yes. BTC and high-beta alts need different thresholds and sizing.
How often should policies be recalibrated?
On a regular schedule, unless clear regime change requires earlier adjustment.
Can interpretation be fully automated?
Partly. Governance still needs human oversight and exception handling.