TL;DR
Market Score is a future methodology concept for discussing composite market quality. It is not part of the current public backend contract.
Clear explanation
This page is conceptual. SignalX does not currently publish a live Market Score field in the backend, public API, or verify flow.
If a future composite score were introduced, it could compress multiple features into one interpretable number for policy discussions.
Until that field exists in the backend contract, treat this page as methodology background rather than a live product capability.
Technical example: hypothetical score decomposition
If a future score existed, it might open at 76 under coherent structure and later fall when entropy rises.
- 01Normalize each feature to a common scale.
- 02Apply composite weights and entropy penalties.
- 03Map the result to policy bands.
- 04Only expose it publicly after the backend contract and verify semantics support it.
ASCII model
vol_z ----\
flow_delta --> Future composite model --> Conceptual market score --> Risk policy
entropy --/
taker_ratio -/Hypothetical score bands and operating posture
| Score band | Interpretation | Risk posture |
|---|---|---|
| 70-100 | Coherent structure | Normal sizing within limits |
| 50-69 | Mixed evidence | Reduced size, tighter invalidation |
| 0-49 | Disorder dominates | Defensive or no-trade |
Related pages
- Market Status states →Use the live CLEAR/TENSE/WAIT/NO-TRADE contract instead of a non-existent score field.
- Verify SNAP payloads →Validate the stored SNAP payload contract that exists today.
- What is SNAP →Understand the actual hash-verifiable context record that exists today.
- How to interpret score concepts →Review how a future composite score could be translated into policy bands.
- Risk management in crypto →Map live market-state and verified context to portfolio controls.
FAQ
Is a high score a guaranteed win?
No. Even as a concept, a score would only support policy decisions and would never guarantee outcomes.
Should thresholds stay fixed forever?
No. Any future score thresholds would require out-of-sample review and explicit governance.
Can score replace risk management?
No. A future score would only be useful when linked to explicit risk controls.